Upcoming Event: CosmicAI Seminar

Cosmic AI Hybrid Seminar Series Talk #3

1) Kyle Lo, Lead Research Scientist at Allen Institute for AI 2) Joydeep Biswas, Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science, The University of Texas at Austin, and Associate Director of Texas Robotics,

Abstract

Tacos to be served! CSEM Students receive credit for attending

Speaker 1:  Olmo 3: State-of-the-art in fully open models

I'll present Olmo 3, a family of 7B and 32B models that dramatically improves easoning, coding, and instruction-following capabilities while providing full transparency across every development stage. Olmo 3 is competitive with the best weights-only models of comparable size and architecture while fully sharing data, code and intermediate checkpoints that enable research interventions beyond final weights. In this talk, I’ll discuss the new techniques developed since Olmo 2, share ideas and stories behind their development, and conclude with lessons learned for making consistent, reliable progress towards more powerful models.

Speaker2: AI-Assisted Peer Review at Scale: The AAAI-26 AI Review Pilot

Frontier multimodal language models are rapidly reshaping how we conduct and evaluate science. This talk presents the AAAI-26 AI review pilot, which explored a specific role for AI in the scientific process: peer review. In response to the explosive growth of AI publishing (over 30,000 initial submissions for AAAI-26) and the increasing technical capabilities of state-of-the-art language models, AAAI-26 ran a pilot in which every paper received one clearly labeled AI-generated review. No human reviewers were replaced, and final decisions remained entirely under human control.  I will describe what we built: a thorough multi-stage AI reviewing system that integrates multiple tools and techniques, with explicit criteria at each step, along with the infrastructure required to generate AI reviews for the full submission set in under 24 hours.  We also ran an exconducted an extensive voluntary survey of authors, reviewers, senior program committee members, and area chairs to assess and compare them with human reviews. Overall, respondents found the AI reviews helpful, and on average, they were preferred to human reviews across 6 of 9 criteria, including overall impressions, review focus, technical accuracy, and research suggestions. We also learned about the current limitations of AI in peer review.  I will close with lessons learned, opportunities for effective human-AI teaming in peer review, and open challenges in building and evaluating AI assistance for scientific reviewing.

Biography

Speaker 1

Kyle Lo is a research scientist at the Allen Institute for AI, where he co-leads the OLMo project on open language modeling. He specializes in large-scale pretraining of language models, with emphasis on data curation and efficient experimentation. His research on domain specialization, evaluation methodology, AI for science, and AI for education has won awards at leading AI conferences in, including ACL, CVPR, EMNLP, CHI, NAACL,d EACL. Kyle obtained his Master’s degree in Statistics from the University of Washington. Outside of work, he enjoys board games, boba tea, D&D, and spending time with his cat Belphegor.

Speaker 2

Joydeep Biswas is an associate professor in the Department of Computer Science at the University of Texas at Austin and Associate Director of Texas Robotics. He leads the Autonomous Mobile Robotics Laboratory (AMRL), where he directs research focused on perception and planning for long-term autonomy in open-world settings. He is a recipient of the NSF CAREER award, the Amazon Research Award, and the JP Morgan Faculty Research Award, and serves as a Trustee of the RoboCup Federation and a Councilor of AAAI. He was an Associate Program Chair for AAAI-26 and led its AI-assisted peer review pilot.